Which is the best x64 C++/C compiler?

Question

I recently installed DOSBox along with TurboC3.0 and it didn't work properly!!! First of all it failed to open all include files, when it did, it had no support for Graphics Library. Please i need help running any C/C++ IDE on my 64Bit Windows 7
Thanks in Advance

Answer 1

Working on my win7 64 bit :)

Dev-c++ compiler :)

http://download.cnet.com/Dev-C/3000-2069_4-12686.html

Answer 2

C Compiler 64 Bit

Answer 3

You do not need a 64-bit compiler to develop on a 64-bit system. If you develop specifically for 64-bit, your apps will not run on 32-bit Windows. Until 64-bit is at least nearly universal, or until the MS .NET sandbox takes over, the safest bet is 32-bit (or setting up projects to compile either way.)



Two good free choices are



1. The Code::Blocks IDE with the MinGW compiler (GNU C/C++ ported to WIndows). Download both, bundled, at:



http://www.codeblocks.org

http://www.codeblocks.org/downloads/26



You can also get a 32/64-bit version of GCC/MInGW at:



http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/



Upgrade to the TDM version (or add the 64-bit MinGW hosted at SourceForge) later, after you get used to the difference between modern C++ and Turbo. Turbo was last developed well before the first ISO standard for C++ and is missing some important features.



2. Microsoft's Visual Studio Express. This is a reduced-function version of the primary tool for developing Windows applications. It's less reduced in function in the 2012 version. Prior versions were single-compiler releases. This is more like the real Visual Studio, with C/C++/C#/VB.NET all in one IDE. I haven't used it yet, so I don't know if the resource editors are all there, but many of those were missing in previous express versions. It runs on 32/64-bit Windows, but I don't yet know if 64-bit targets are supported. They were not in earlier versions. (I have to finish migrating to 7, since VS2012 doesn't support Vista or XP.)



http://www.microsoft.com/visualstudio/eng/products/visual-studio-express-for-windows-desktop



Dev-C++ works, but it's no longer being developed since about 2005. It was written in Delphi, the descendant of the original Turbo product that put Borland on the map: Turbo Pascal, so you might find that more comfortable. Like Code::Blocks, it is an IDE, not a compiler. It uses (by default, anyway) the same MinGW compiler that Code::Blocks uses. An earlier answer has a C-net link for that. I'd prefer getting it from the source if I were going to use it, but the bundled MinGW is pretty old.



http://www.bloodshed.net/dev/devcpp.html

Answer 4

isn't homestead windows 7 a canines? Wait until eventually you try to community that piece of garbage. go on-line as Administrator to position on your determination of compilers. i comprehend MinGW. i exploit Linux64/ NetBeans/ c-plugin with the gcc or MinGW. i visit point it for %. Your modern-day obfuscation has to with Administrator Privileges. some human beings revealed on forums they re-format the not effortless force, re-installation homestead windows to attain their compiler.