Question:
is WYSIWYG or HTML coding better in a website creation?
anonymous
2009-09-01 22:38:50 UTC
is WYSIWYG or HTML coding better in a website creation?
Seven answers:
?
2009-09-02 01:41:26 UTC
WYSIWYG are for amateurs who have no idea about coding.

They will always lead you to a dead end when you will want or need to do anything "special".

They generate code that is unreadable and unmaintainable by any other mean than the original editor.

They usually create code that is compatible with ONE browser and for only ONE resolution (unacceptable): they are incapable of catering for all browsers' incompatibilities.

Hand coding (through text editor like Notepad++) is for professionals who know what they are doing, who can write code efficiently and has no limitation whatsoever.

Using a wysiwyg editor to "save time" does NOT save time: editing the code afterwards takes more time than starting from scratch (at least for good coders).

- You prepare your pages (or parts of) with a good graphic editor. (Photoshop is the Industry standard);

- You slice your images yourself (NOT using photoshop: their slicing is crap).

- You write your code, linking to the images you want.



That way, I can write the skeleton of a complex application in less than a day.



Anyone applying for a job at my company and just mentionning any kind of wysiwyg will be shown the door on the spot, interview terminated.
anonymous
2009-09-01 22:43:13 UTC
Depends on how well you know the HTML code language. Get good at website design and you may be able to do better than a WYSIWYG offers.
?
2016-12-24 21:22:52 UTC
that's purely a rely of decision. as an occasion, i'm a expert internet developer who usually makes use of uncomplicated textual content fabric editors like Notepad whilst i'm coming up fairly uncomplicated internet web pages. i do no longer prefer fancy syntax highlighting... i'm no longer an fool who desires syntax highlighting on uncomplicated markup. on the different hand, if i'm engaged on a greater complicated project and actually doing somewhat scripting or programming (Java, C++, Hypertext Preprocessor, etc.) then i'm going to apply an IDE or Notepad++ to make it much less complicated to debug. to assert that folk who use Notepad are stupid fairly shows how naive a number of those youthful builders are, as i'm specific many of the web pages that they are nevertheless reading their HTML tutorials on have been created applying none different than Notepad...
skelley
2016-12-17 14:38:14 UTC
it is only a count of determination. working example, i'm a consultant internet developer who in many cases makes use of undeniable text textile editors like Notepad whilst i'm bobbing up fairly undemanding internet websites. i do no longer want fancy syntax highlighting... i'm no longer an fool who desires syntax highlighting on undemanding markup. on the different hand, if i'm engaged on a greater complicated undertaking and definitely appearing some scripting or programming (Java, C++, Hypertext Preprocessor, and so on.) then i'm going to apply an IDE or Notepad++ to make it much less complicated to debug. to assert that folk who use Notepad are stupid fairly shows how naive a number of those youthful builders are, as i'm particular lots of the web pages that they are nevertheless analyzing their HTML tutorials on have been created making use of none different than Notepad...
?
2009-09-01 22:42:59 UTC
HTML coding. You have better control and learn more.
Fudge
2009-09-01 23:06:46 UTC
Buddy, learn HTML well and then use WYSIWYG , as WISYWIG will you save ur time !!!
anonymous
2009-09-01 22:43:08 UTC
Depends on whether you want to print an exact copy of the screen or not.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...