Actually, the answer is "NO". At least in software companies who take their work seriously.
IDEs do "things" for you, the way they have programmed to do. The problem is that it LIMITS the freedom of programmers to standard procedures which are not, necessarely, those the programmer wants to achieve their targets.
Like a C compiler generating masses of code in assembler, the resulting code is FAR from being efficient! (a C compiled source generates an assembler code about 6 times LARGER than the very same code written directly in Assembler, and, of course, six times slower).
So, no, professionals with experience by-pass the IDEs.
However, since the majority of programmers are mediocre, IDEs are a sufficient solution to build the majority of crappy software.
But never think that a piece of software that is SENSITIVE (hospitals, security, military, aviation, banking and so-on) will be written by beginners using IDEs!
As a small story: we developed a totalisator for greyhound racing, and we used the IDE (C) for the initial stages of development (5 programmers). After one month of total confusion, the IDE was scrapped, and we wrote the whole program with a plain text editor. The job went smoothly, very fast, and was pretty enhoyable! I think that if 5 collegues, professional programmers, concurred to scrap the IDE, they had a pretty good reason!
Later on, in my own software company, IDEs were used at start, to understand the principles of the compilers, but very soon scrapped to be replaced by plain text editors and command lines.
Further even, working as a consultant for the Military, I re-wrote, in Assembler, the code for a remote controller for a drone. The reason? The code generated by the C compiler would not fit the memory available in the controller (12Mb). The re-write used on 2Mb of assembler, and we were able to add MANY features, that would have been impossible should we have kept the C compiler.
Many more examples in my life...
And other very typical example of "IDE" is Dreamweaver... Look at the code generated: it is the CRAPPIEST you can EVER FIND! (And totally unmaintainable, and incapable on dealing with anycomplex interactive functions)